Regeneration of alveolar bone defects in the experimental pig model: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

AbstractObjectivePigs are emerging as a preferred experimental in vivo model for bone regeneration. The study objective was to answer the focused PEO question: in the pig model (P), what is the capacity of experimental alveolar bone defects (E) for spontaneous regeneration in terms of new bone formation (O)?MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, electronic databases were searched for studies reporting experimental bone defects or extraction socket healing in the maxillae or mandibles of pigs. The main inclusion criteria were the presence of a control group of untreated defects/sockets and the assessment of regeneration via 3D tomography [radiographic defect fill (RDF)] or 2D histomorphometry [new bone formation (NBF)]. Random effects meta‐analyses were performed for the outcomes RDF and NBF.ResultsOverall, 45 studies were included reporting on alveolar bone defects or extraction sockets, most frequently in the mandibles of minipigs. Based on morphology, defects were broadly classified as ‘box‐defects’ (BD) or ‘cylinder‐defects’ (CD) with a wide range of healing times (10 days to 52 weeks). Meta‐analyses revealed pooled estimates (with 95% confidence intervals) of 50% RDF (36.87%–63.15%) and 43.74% NBF (30.47%–57%) in BD, and 44% RDF (16.48%–71.61%) and 39.67% NBF (31.53%–47.81%) in CD, which were similar to estimates of socket‐healing [48.74% RDF (40.35%–57.13%) and 38.73% NBF (28.57%–48.89%)]. Heterogeneity in the meta‐analysis was high (I2 > 90%).ConclusionA substantial body of literature revealed a high capacity for spontaneous regeneration in experimental alveolar bone defects of (mini)pigs, which should be considered in future studies of bone regeneration in this animal model.