The German version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (D‐OCS): Normative data and validation in acute stroke and a mixed neurological sample

Abstract

AbstractGiven the frequency of stroke worldwide, tools for neuropsychological assessment of patients with acute stroke are needed to identify cognitive impairments, guide rehabilitation efforts and allow for a prognosis of outcome. However, requirements for assessment tools for acute cognitive deficits differ substantially from tests for chronic neuropsychological impairments and screening tools for suspected dementia. The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS) has been developed as a quick to administer neurocognitive screening for acute neurological patients providing information on various cognitive domains. It is available in different languages. The present study reports cut‐off scores, parallel‐test reliability and concurrent validity of the German version (D‐OCS). Following standardized language adaptation and translation, the D‐OCS was administered to 100 healthy individuals to generate cut‐off scores (5th percentile). Subsequently, 88 neurological patients were assessed with both versions of the D‐OCS as well as other tests to evaluate reliability and validity of the D‐OCS subscales. In a further study, the D‐OCS was compared to the MoCA test in 65 acute stroke patients revealing comparable sensitivity but also differences between both tools. The cut‐off scores were comparable to other international versions of the OCS. Intraclass correlations were highly significant and document reliability of the D‐OCS subtests. Scores on subtests correlated significantly with independent tests securing validity. Comparison with the MoCA revealed comparable sensitivity and specificity. The D‐OCS is a reliable and valid assessment tool well suited for patients with acute stroke. Differences to the MoCA test are discussed.