Affiliation:
1. Chinese University of Hong Kong
Abstract
Since the mid-1980s, political scientists, in particular historical institutionalists, have employed evolutionary theory to study institutional stasis and change. More recently, there have been calls for ‘taking evolution seriously’. This article will frame the earlier uses of evolutionary theory by historical institutionalists, and the recent calls for ‘taking evolution seriously’ into a hierarchy of levels of interaction between natural and social sciences. Put in this perspective, the earlier efforts can be seen as limiting the use of evolutionary theory at the lowest, metaphorical level. On the other hand, the recent calls are striving to advance political science’s interaction with biological science to analogous and homologous levels, and even make it part of the larger project of generalizing Darwinism. These are noble scientific explorations. However, they should not lead to an impression that using evolutionary theory metaphorically is necessarily unserious.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. How Homelands Change;Journal of Conflict Resolution;2019-08-13
2. Cognitive Evolution Theory;World Ordering;2019-02-28
3. Evolutionary Ontology;World Ordering;2019-02-28
4. Samurai Crabs and International Social Orders;World Ordering;2019-02-28
5. Prologue;World Ordering;2019-02-28