Affiliation:
1. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Arnold School of Public Health University of South Carolina Columbia SC USA
2. Department of General Pediatrics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN USA
3. School of Medicine University of South Carolina Columbia SC USA
4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and MIND Institute University of California Davis Health Sacramento CA USA
5. Department of Psychology University of South Carolina Columbia SC USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe characterisation of autism in fragile X syndrome (FXS) has been a source of controversy due to the complexity of disentangling autism traits from common features of the FXS phenotype. Autism in FXS is significantly underdiagnosed in the community, which may be partly due to insufficient clinical description of the social interaction profile of autism within the FXS phenotype. In this study, we applied a classic framework for characterising social interaction styles in autism to a sample of young adult males with FXS and co‐occurring autism to enhance understanding of how the social challenges associated with autism manifest within FXS.MethodsParticipants were 41 males (M age = 18 years) with FXS and co‐occurring autism. Interaction samples were coded for expression of predominately ‘active’ (characterised by a desire to make social approaches) or ‘passive’ (characterised by lack of initiation of social approach towards others) interaction profiles. Differences in the expression of phenotypic features of FXS, including anxiety, attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder, cognitive, adaptive and language impairments and autism symptom severity, were examined across those with passive and active interaction styles.ResultsApproximately half of the sample was classified as active and half as passive, demonstrating diversity in the social phenotype of autism associated with FXS. The two subtypes did not differ in autism severity, anxiety or attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms or in cognitive, adaptive or language abilities.ConclusionsThis study enhances understanding of FXS‐associated autism by documenting phenotypic variability in the social interaction profile in this group, with active and passive social interaction styles represented. The two social interaction styles were not associated with differential expression of common phenotypic features of FXS, suggesting similar support needs.
Funder
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
National Institute on Aging
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献