Effect of 980 nm photobiomodulation delivered by a handpiece with Gaussian vs. Flat‐Top profiles on proliferation and differentiation of buccal fat pad stem cells

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Gaussian and Flat‐Top profiles in proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cell of buccal fat pad. Based on the timing schedule and type of laser handpieces, the cells were assigned to a control group with no radiation, and two irradiation test groups (980 nm) with Flat‐Top (F) (power of 1.1 W, beam area of 1 cm2) and standard Gaussian (G) (power of 0.7 W, beam area of 0.5 cm2) handpieces. Each test group was divided into three subgroups, receiving one time (60 J/cm2), two times (120 J/cm2), and three times (180 J/cm2) irradiation. 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2, 5‐diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and Annexin V tests were performed. The Alizarin Red staining and polymerase chain reaction tests were done both at the beginning and the end of the first and second weeks. The degree of mineralization and expression of osteogenic markers, RUNX2, OCN, and OPN were evaluated. Based on the MTT and Annexin V test results, both test groups outperformed the control group in degrees of cell proliferation during the first day of laser irradiation (p < 0.05). After one and two times irradiation, the expression of osteogenic markers in the test groups was significantly higher than the control group. PBM with Flat‐Top and Gaussian handpieces can enhance ossification and cell differentiation regardless of the type of handpieces.