Scoping review of systematic reviews of nursing interventions in a neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery

Author:

Foster Jann1234,Pathrose Sheeja Perumbil14ORCID,Briguglio Laura15,Trajkovski Suza1,Lowe Patricia67,Muirhead Renee89,Jyoti Jeewan10,Ng Linda1112ORCID,Blay Nicole1ORCID,Spence Kaye113,Chetty Natasha11,Broom Margaret125

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing and Midwifery Western Sydney University Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. School of Nursing and Midwifery University of Canberra Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

3. Ingham Research Institute Liverpool New South Wales Australia

4. NSW Centre for Evidence Based Health Care: A JBI Affiliated Group Penrith New South Wales Australia

5. Neonatology Centenary Hospital for Women and Children Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

6. Australian College of Nursing Sydney New South Wales Australia

7. School of Nursing and Midwifery University of Technology Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

8. Neonatal Critical Care Unit Mater Mothers' Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia

9. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work University of Queensland St. Lucia Queensland Australia

10. Grace Centre for Newborn Intensive Care The Children's Hospital at Westmead Westmead New South Wales Australia

11. Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia

12. School of Nursing and Midwifery University of Southern Queensland Ipswich Queensland Australia

13. Australasian NIDCAP Training Centre The Children's Hospital at Westmead Westmead New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractAim(s)To identify, synthesise and map systematic reviews of the effectiveness of nursing interventions undertaken in a neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery.DesignThis scoping review was conducted according to the JBI scoping review framework.MethodsReview included systematic reviews that evaluated any nurse‐initiated interventions that were undertaken in an NICU or SCN setting. Studies that reported one or more positive outcomes related to the nursing interventions were only considered for this review. Each outcome for nursing interventions was rated a ‘certainty (quality) of evidence’ according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria.Data SourcesSystematic reviews were sourced from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence Synthesis for reviews published until February 2023.ResultsA total of 428 articles were identified; following screening, 81 reviews underwent full‐text screening, and 34 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Multiple nursing interventions reporting positive outcomes were identified and were grouped into seven categories. Respiratory 7/34 (20%) and Nutrition 8/34 (23%) outcomes were the most reported categories. Developmental care was the next most reported category 5/34 (15%) followed by Thermoregulation, 5/34 (15%) Jaundice 4/34 (12%), Pain 4/34 (12%) and Infection 1/34 (3%).ConclusionsThis review has identified nursing interventions that have a direct positive impact on neonatal outcomes. However, further applied research is needed to transfer this empirical knowledge into clinical practice.Implications for the profession and/or patient careImplementing up‐to‐date evidence on effective nursing interventions has the potential to significantly improving neonatal outcomes.Patient or public contributionNo patient or public involvement in this scoping review.

Funder

Australian College of Neonatal Nurses

Publisher

Wiley

Reference56 articles.

1. NIDCAP improves brain function and structure in preterm infants with severe intrauterine growth restriction

2. Gradual versus abrupt discontinuation of oxygen in preterm or low birth weight infants

3. Prophylactic oral/topical non-absorbed antifungal agents to prevent invasive fungal infection in very low birth weight infants

4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2023).Australia's mothers and babies.https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/mothers‐babies/australias‐mothers‐babies

5. Evaluation of nurses' workload in the intensive care unit, neonatal intensive care unit and coronary care unit: An analytical study;Azadi M.;Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3