Development and psychometric testing of the actualisation of evidence‐based nursing instrument

Author:

Parisod Heidi1234ORCID,Stolt Minna35ORCID,Holopainen Arja125ORCID,Siltanen Hannele125ORCID,Pasanen Miko3ORCID,Suhonen Riitta36ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Nursing Research Foundation Helsinki Finland

2. WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Helsinki Finland

3. Department of Nursing Science University of Turku Turku Finland

4. The Finnish Centre for Evidence‐Based Health Care ‐ A JBI Centre of Excellence Helsinki Finland

5. Satakunta Wellbeing Services County Pori Finland

6. Turku University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of Southwest Finland Turku Finland

Abstract

AbstractAimTo describe the development of the Actualisation of Evidence‐Based Nursing instrument targeted at nurses working in clinical practice (ActEBN‐nurses), meant for evaluating the actualisation of individual and organisational‐level support structures for evidence‐based nursing within social and healthcare organisations, and to test its validity and reliability.DesignCross‐sectional survey.MethodsThe FinYHKÄ model was used as the theoretical background of the instrument development and supplemented with the JBI Model of Evidence‐Based Healthcare, previous literature and items from a previous instrument, the Evidence‐Based Practice Process Assessment Scale, with permission of the copyright holders. After two rounds of expert panel and piloting, a national survey was conducted with the instrument in 2021. The target group consisted of nurses working in clinical practice. Psychometric testing included internal consistency (Omega, item analysis) confirmatory factor analysis and t‐test for comparison of two groups' differences (sensitivity).ResultsA new instrument, ActEBN‐nurses was developed, comprising two parts: Individual‐level (32 items, 5‐point Likert‐scale) and Organisational‐level support structures for evidence‐based nursing (37 items, 5‐point Likert‐scale). In total, 1289 nurses participated in the survey. The ActEBN‐nurses proved to have good internal consistency in both parts (Omega ω .931 and .966), structural validity and sensitivity based on the two educational levels within the sample. The structure of both parts was slightly modified, based on the CFA modification indices, considering the impact of the reverse worded items in part Individual and redundant items within both parts.ConclusionThe ActEBN‐nurses has promising psychometrics, and it can be used for evaluating individual and organisational‐level support structures for evidence‐based nursing within social and healthcare organisations.Implications for the profession and/or patient careEvaluation of the support structures within social and healthcare organisations is needed to recognise shortcomings in current structures and advance evidence‐based nursing across different contexts.Reporting MethodThe authors state that they have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines: STROBE statement for cross‐sectional studies.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3