Surgeon perceptions of personality as an influencing factor on anastomotic decision‐making: A qualitative analysis

Author:

Bisset Carly N.12ORCID,Moug Susan J.134ORCID,Oliphant Raymond25,Dames Nicola6,Cleland Jennifer7

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Surgery Royal Alexandra Hospital Paisley UK

2. School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK

3. Department of General Surgery Golden Jubilee University National Hospital Clydebank UK

4. University of Glasgow Glasgow UK

5. Department of Colorectal Surgery Raigmore Hospital Inverness UK

6. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Patient Liaison Group Glasgow UK

7. Medical Education Research and Scholarship Unit, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore

Abstract

AbstractAimSurgeon personality is a factor influencing rectal anastomotic decision‐making. However, it is unclear how or why this may be the case, or what aspects of personality are involved. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of colorectal surgeons on how their individual personality may influence variation in anastomotic decision‐making.MethodPurposive sampling was used to invite certified UK‐based colorectal surgeons to participate, with individual interviews used for data collection. Participants were recruited until ongoing data review indicated no new codes were generated (i.e. data sufficiency). Data were analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke's six‐step framework.ResultsSeventeen colorectal surgeons (eight female, nine male) participated. Two key themes relating to personality and decision‐making were identified: (1) surgeon development and training and (2) patient–surgeon interactions, each with relevant subthemes. Surgeons described how their personality may influence patients’ postoperative outcomes (e.g. decision‐making, team working and communication) and potential mechanisms for how their personality may influence operative risk‐taking. Following anastomotic leakage, surgeons described a disproportionate sense of guilt and responsibility. There appears to be a significant transition in responsibility from trainee to newly appointed consultant, which may be part of the ‘hidden curriculum’ of surgical training.ConclusionColorectal surgeons have described their perceptions of how personality traits may impact variation in decision‐making and patient outcomes for the first time. Early career surgeons felt ill‐prepared for the level of guilt experienced when managing complications. Surgeons appear open to personality assessment if this was through an educational lens, with the aim of improving decision‐making following complications and overall performance.

Funder

Bowel Research UK

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3