On the importance of being clear about the level of analysis of interest: An illustration using the case of self‐compassion

Author:

Büchner Anabel1ORCID,Ewert Christina2ORCID,Hoffmann Cosma F. A.3ORCID,Schröder‐Abé Michela2ORCID,Horstmann Kai T.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Psychology Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany

2. Department of Psychology University of Potsdam Potsdam Germany

3. Institute of Psychology University of Greifswald Greifswald Germany

4. Department of Psychology University of Siegen Siegen Germany

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTheories about within‐person (WP) variation are often tested using between‐person (BP) research, despite the well‐established fact that results may not generalize across levels of analysis. One possible explanation is vague theories that do not specify which level of analysis is of interest. We illustrate such a case using the construct of self‐compassion. The factor structure at the BP level has been highly debated, although the theory is actually concerned with relationships at the WP level.MethodMultilevel confirmatory factor analysis was applied to experience‐sampling data of self‐compassion (N = 213, with n = 4052 measurement occasions).ResultsAt both levels of analysis, evidence for a two‐factor model was found. However, the factors were moderately related at the WP level (r = 0.37, p < 0.001) but largely independent at the BP level (r = 0.04, p = 0.696). Exploratory analyses revealed considerable heterogeneity in the WP relationship among individuals.ConclusionWe discuss how our results provide new impulses to move the debate around self‐compassion forward. Lastly, we outline how the WP level—which is of major interest for self‐compassion and other constructs in psychology—can guide the conceptualization and assessment to promote advancements of the theory and resulting applications.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference98 articles.

1. Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Self-Compassion Scale

2. Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling

3. The validity and reliability of the Iranian version of the self‐compassion scale;Azizi A.;Practice in Clinical Psychology,2013

4. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3