A technological biodiversity monitoring toolkit for biocredits

Author:

Ford Helen V.12ORCID,Schrodt Franziska1,Zieritz Alexandra1,Exton Daniel A.2,van der Heijden Geertje1ORCID,Teague Jonathan3,Coles Tim2,Field Richard1

Affiliation:

1. School of Geography University of Nottingham Nottingham UK

2. Operation Wallacea Lincolnshire UK

3. School of Physics University of Bristol Bristol UK

Abstract

Abstract Biodiversity is in crisis globally, and we consistently fail to hit global targets to stem its loss. Inspired by the Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, the biodiversity credit market offers an avenue for vital funding for biodiversity conservation projects around the world. Various biodiversity credit methodologies and standards are becoming available, and most will require the measurement and monitoring of biodiversity at scale. Private investment in conservation through biodiversity credits entails specific needs for biodiversity data collection, including the need for biodiversity claims to be verifiable. We conceptualise these requirements around ‘SAGED’ criteria: Scalable, Accessible, Granular (data of appropriate spatial, taxonomic and temporal resolution), Evidenceable and Directly measured (where possible). Measuring and monitoring biodiversity across ecosystems, ecoregions and taxa is expensive and time‐consuming with traditional survey methods. These methods often rely on access to experts with sufficient taxonomic and survey expertise, which is challenging in many parts of the world. Accordingly, we review biodiversity monitoring technologies and assess their readiness to fulfil key requirements of assessments for the purpose of nature accounting for biodiversity credits (particularly SAGED criteria). We focus on monitoring technologies that are commonly cited by biodiversity credit methodologies, including (e)DNA metabarcoding, passive acoustic monitoring and various other remote sensing methods. We also explore the current limits of these techniques in obtaining appropriate biodiversity measures and metrics for biodiversity finance. Synthesis and applications. Technological solutions for biodiversity monitoring are not (yet) a panacea but are key for evidenceable monitoring at scale. For current use in biocredit markets, we advise these are combined with ground validation and human‐collected ecological data. Developments in automation and machine learning will rapidly make these technologies more accessible and efficient.

Funder

Natural Environment Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3