Synthesis on the effectiveness of soil translocation for plant community restoration

Author:

Gerrits Gijs M.12ORCID,Waenink Rik3,Aradottir Asa L.4,Buisson Elise5ORCID,Dutoit Thierry5ORCID,Ferreira Maxmiller C.6ORCID,Fontaine Joseph B.7ORCID,Jaunatre Renaud58ORCID,Kardol Paul9ORCID,Loeb Roos10,Magro Ruiz Sandra11ORCID,Maltz Mia12ORCID,Pärtel Meelis13ORCID,Peco Begona14ORCID,Piqueray Julien15ORCID,Pilon Natashi A. L.16,Santa‐Regina Ignacio17ORCID,Schmidt Katharina T.18ORCID,Sengl Philip19ORCID,van Diggelen Rudy20ORCID,Vieira Daniel L. M.21ORCID,von Brackel Wolfgang22,Waryszak Pawel2324ORCID,Wills Tim J.25,Marrs Rob H.26,Wubs E. R. Jasper2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Mathematical and Statistical Methods Group (Biometris) Wageningen University and Research Wageningen The Netherlands

2. Department of Terrestrial Ecology Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO‐KNAW) Wageningen The Netherlands

3. Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group Wageningen University and Research Wageningen The Netherlands

4. Faculty of Environmental and Forest Sciences Agricultural University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland

5. Mediterranean Institute of Biodiversity and Ecology (IMBE) Avignon University, Aix Marseille University, CNRS, IRD Avignon France

6. Ecology Graduate Program Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasília Brasília Brazil

7. Environmental and Conservation Sciences Murdoch University Perth Australia

8. University of Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, LESSEM St‐Martin‐d'Hères France

9. Department of Forest Ecology and Management Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Umeå Sweden

10. B‐WARE Research Centre Nijmegen The Netherlands

11. Creando Redes NatCap S.L. Madrid Spain

12. Riverside, Center for Conservation Biology University of California Riverside California USA

13. Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences University of Tartu Tartu Estonia

14. Terrestrial Ecology Group (TEG), Department of Ecology Institute for Biodiversity and Global Change, Autonomous University of Madrid Madrid Spain

15. Natagriwal ASBL, Site de Gembloux. Gembloux Belgium

16. Institute of Biology University of Campinas (UNICAMP) Campinas Brazil

17. Institute of Natural Resources and Agrobiology of Salamanca Salamanca Spain

18. Center for Environmental Biology University of California Irvine California USA

19. Engineering office for Biology Sankt Anna am Aigen Austria

20. Department of Biology Ecosystem Management Research Group, University of Antwerp Antwerp Belgium

21. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology Brasília Brazil

22. Büro für Vegetationskundlich‐Ökologische Gutachten & Lichenologie Röttenbach Germany

23. Deakin University Burwood Victoria Australia

24. University of Southern Queensland Toowoomba Queensland Australia

25. The Ecology Office Pty Ltd Melbourne Victoria Australia

26. School of Environmental Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

Abstract

Abstract Many degraded ecosystems need active restoration to conserve biodiversity and re‐establish ecosystem function, both highlighted targets of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration and the proposed EU Nature restoration law. Soil translocation, where both plant propagules and their associated soil biota are co‐introduced, has increasingly been proposed as a powerful restoration technique for terrestrial ecosystems. However, a synthesis of the effectiveness of this method across ecosystems is lacking. To address how soil translocation affects restoration success, we performed a meta‐analysis synthesizing data from 46 field experiments and their respective reference ecosystems in 17 countries across four continents. In each experiment, vegetation composition was recorded in response to soil translocation treatments and the resultant vegetational changes (diversity and composition) were quantified. We found that soil translocation leads to plant community development further away from the control and more towards the reference plant communities compared with treatments where only plant propagules were introduced. However, the variability of effect sizes among experiments was large, suggesting strong dependence of restoration success on restoration context. We found that restoration success was more likely on loamy soils and when translocation treatments were implemented over larger spatial areas (>180 m2). Furthermore, we found that restoration success either consistently increased or decreased over time depending on the experiment. Not only is this congruent with positive feedbacks between plant and soil communities driving plant community development, but it also suggests that the composition of the translocated plant and soil communities, and initial starting conditions, are critical for long‐term restoration success. Synthesis and applications. Our analysis highlights soil translocation can be a successful restoration method across a broad range of ecosystems. However, its implementation needs to depend on a thorough evaluation of local conditions and the potential added value. Further refinement of soil translocation techniques is needed to increase success rates.

Funder

British Ecological Society

Estonian Research Competency Council

European Regional Development Fund

Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3