Honderich on Well-being and Equality

Author:

Gordon David

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Political Science and International Relations

Reference4 articles.

1. The Question of Well-being and the Principle of Equality

2. 2. In order to eliminate distress on the part of parents or relatives, one can confine the experiments to abandoned babies.

3. 3. It would not be a good objection to this that there might be other ways of raising the average life-span of one of the tribes which would be less drastic. Why, for example, can't one of the tribes be removed and resettled elsewhere? Granted this point, the question is,giventhat exterminating one of the tribes is the only available means of raising the life-span of the other, does the Principle dictate this course of action?

4. 4. If one applies the Principle across societies, then, assuming lexical priority for the primary desire, it would seem allowable to reduce the people of England to bare susbistence in order to raise the life-span of Nigerians. If it is objected that Honderich allows confining the Principle to one society or nation, on what basis would such a restriction be made? It seems a purelyad hocmeasure.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3