Discrimination in Scientific Review: A Natural Field Experiment on Blind versus Non‐Blind Reviews*-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Discrimination in Scientific Review: A Natural Field Experiment on Blind versus Non‐Blind Reviews*

Published:2012-01-27 Issue:2 Volume:114 Page:500-519
ISSN:0347-0520
Container-title:The Scandinavian Journal of Economics
language:en
Short-container-title:Scand. J. of Economics

Author:

Carlsson Fredrik¹,Löfgren Åsa²,Sterner Thomas²

Affiliation:

1. University of Gothenburg, SE‐405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden fredrik.

2. University of Gothenburg, SE‐405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2011.01690.x

Reference20 articles.

1. The Status of Women in Environmental Economics

2. The Effects of Double‐Blind versus Single‐Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from the American Economic Review;Blank R. M.;American Economic Review,1991

3. Chapter 13 The economic analysis of labor market discrimination: A survey

4. Gender Differences in Preferences

5. Are Women at a Disadvantage in Publishing Journal Articles?;Ferber M.;Eastern Economic Journal,1980

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Are Economics Conferences Gender‐Neutral? Evidence from Ireland*;Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics;2023-09-13

2. Narrative medicine and humanities for health professions education: an experimental study;Medical Education Online;2023-07-11

3. Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration;Psychological Science in the Public Interest;2023-04-26

4. The impact of double-blind peer review on gender bias in scientific publishing: a systematic review;American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology;2022-07

5. Double- vs single-blind peer review effect on acceptance rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials;American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM;2022-07