Affiliation:
1. Department of Pathology Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark
2. Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark
3. Department of Pathology Halmstad Hospital Halmstad Sweden
4. Department of Pathology Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden
Abstract
Double‐stranded RNA (dsRNA) is produced during most viral infections, and immunohistochemical detection of dsRNA has been proposed as a potential screening marker for viral replication. The anti‐dsRNA monoclonal antibody clone 9D5 is more sensitive than the established clone J2 but has not been validated in formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissue. This study aimed to test and compare the performance of the anti‐dsRNA monoclonal antibodies, 9D5 and J2, in FFPE tissue using an automated staining platform. Archived clinical tissue samples with viral infections (n = 34) and uninfected controls (n = 30) were examined. Immunohistochemical staining for dsRNA (9D5 and J2) and virus‐specific epitopes was performed. 9D5 provided a similar staining pattern but a higher signal‐to‐noise ratio than J2. The following proportions of virus‐infected tissue samples were dsRNA‐positive: SARS‐CoV‐2 (5/5), HPV (6/6), MCV (5/5), CMV (5/6), HSV (4/6), and EBV (0/6). Also, 18 of 30 uninfected samples were dsRNA positive, and an association between fixation time and intensity was observed. However, signals in all samples were markedly reduced by pretreatment with dsRNA‐specific RNAse‐III, indicating a specific reaction. In conclusion, dsRNA can be demonstrated in most viral infections with immunohistochemistry in FFPE tissue but with low clinical specificity. The antibody clone 9D5 performs better than clone J2.
Subject
Microbiology (medical),General Medicine,Immunology and Allergy,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献