Prevention strategies for vasovagal reaction in whole blood donors: A quadri‐armed randomised control trial

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionVasovagal reaction (VVR) is a frequently encountered generalised donor adverse reaction, associated with donor deterrence towards future donation. Several mitigation strategies for prevention of VVR were tried but still not standardised. This quadri‐armed randomised study evaluated the utility of water ingestion, applied muscle tension (AMT) and combination of both in preventing the VVR among blood donors.MethodsA quadri‐armed randomised controlled trial was performed on 4320 whole blood donors. Blood donors of 18–65 years of age were randomised into four groups based on the interventions performed i.e., control with no intervention (Group 1, n = 1081), water ingestion (Group 2, n = 1082), AMT (Group 3, n = 1070) and combined intervention (Group 4, n = 1087). VVR during and immediately after blood donation were observed along with assessment of risk factors in blood donors and the effectiveness of interventions were analysed.ResultsThe incidence of VVR observed 1.6% in our study, with the highest occurrence in the control group (2.5%) and the lowest in the combined intervention group (0.9%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the control group donors faced a 1.38‐fold greater risk of VVR compared to those receiving interventions (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.10–1.75). Other risk factors included younger age (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.05–2.17), first‐time donation (OR: 5.7, 95% CI: 1.66–5.74), prior history of VVR (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 10.4–101.52).Discussion/ConclusionThe combined approach of water ingestion and AMT proved significantly more effective in VVR prevention compared to individual interventions.