Prehospital point‐of‐care ultrasound in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms—a retrospective cohort study

Author:

Lauridsen Signe Voigt12ORCID,Bøtker Morten Thingemann23,Eldrup Nikolaj4,Juhl‐Olsen Peter15

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

2. Department of Research and Development, Prehospital Emergency Medical Service Central Denmark Region Aarhus Denmark

3. Department of Anaesthesiology Randers Region Hospital Randers Denmark

4. Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

5. Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPatients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) require immediate vascular treatment to survive. The use of prehospital point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) may support clinical assessment, correct diagnosis, appropriate triage and reduce system delay. The aim was to study the process of care and outcome in patients receiving prehospital POCUS versus patients not receiving prehospital POCUS in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending aortic rupture.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study in patients diagnosed with rAAA in the Central Denmark Region treated by a prehospital critical care physician from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. Performance of prehospital POCUS was extracted from the prehospital electronic health records. System delay was defined as the time from the emergency phone call to the emergency medical service dispatch centre until the start of surgery. Data on patients primary hospital admission to a centre with/without vascular treatment expertise, treatments and complications including death were extracted from electronic health records.ResultsWe included 169 patients; prehospital POCUS was performed in 124 patients (73%). Emergency surgical treatment was performed in 71 patients. The overall survival in the POCUS group was 39% versus 16% in the NO POCUS group (hazard ratio (HR) (95% 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41–0.89, p = .011). In the POCUS group 99/124 (80%) were directly admitted to a vascular surgical centre versus 25/45 (56%) in the NO POCUS, RD 24% (95% CI: 8–40)), (p = .002). In the POCUS group, system delay was a median of 142 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 121–189) and a median of 232 minutes (IQR 166–305) in the NO POCUS group (p = .006). In a multivariable analysis incorporating age, sex, previously known rAAA, and typical clinical symptoms of rAAA, the HR for death was 0.57, 95% CI 0.38–0.86 (p = .008) favouring prehospital POCUS.ConclusionsPrehospital POCUS was associated with reduced time to treatment, higher chance of operability and significantly higher 30‐day survival in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending rupture of an AAA in this retrospective study. Residual confounding cannot be excluded. This study supports the clinical relevance of prehospital POCUS of the abdominal aorta.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Prähospitaler Ultraschall in der Notfallmedizin;Die Anaesthesiologie;2024-07-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3