Cortical linear encoding and decoding of sounds: Similarities and differences between naturalistic speech and music listening

Author:

Simon Adèle12ORCID,Bech Søren12,Loquet Gérard3,Østergaard Jan1

Affiliation:

1. Artificial Intelligence and Sound, Department of Electronic Systems Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark

2. Research Department Bang & Olufsen A/S Struer Denmark

3. Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractLinear models are becoming increasingly popular to investigate brain activity in response to continuous and naturalistic stimuli. In the context of auditory perception, these predictive models can be ‘encoding’, when stimulus features are used to reconstruct brain activity, or ‘decoding’ when neural features are used to reconstruct the audio stimuli. These linear models are a central component of some brain–computer interfaces that can be integrated into hearing assistive devices (e.g., hearing aids). Such advanced neurotechnologies have been widely investigated when listening to speech stimuli but rarely when listening to music. Recent attempts at neural tracking of music show that the reconstruction performances are reduced compared with speech decoding. The present study investigates the performance of stimuli reconstruction and electroencephalogram prediction (decoding and encoding models) based on the cortical entrainment of temporal variations of the audio stimuli for both music and speech listening. Three hypotheses that may explain differences between speech and music stimuli reconstruction were tested to assess the importance of the speech‐specific acoustic and linguistic factors. While the results obtained with encoding models suggest different underlying cortical processing between speech and music listening, no differences were found in terms of reconstruction of the stimuli or the cortical data. The results suggest that envelope‐based linear modelling can be used to study both speech and music listening, despite the differences in the underlying cortical mechanisms.

Funder

Innovationsfonden

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Neuroscience

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3