Fully Automated Versions of Clinically Validated Nephrometry Scores Demonstrate Superior Predictive Utility versus Human Scores

Author:

Wood Andrew M.1ORCID,Abdallah Nour1ORCID,Heller Nicholas2,Benidir Tarik1,Isensee Fabian3,Tejpaul Resha2,Suk‐ouichai Chalairat4,Curry Caleb1,You Alex5,Remer Erick6,Haywood Samuel1,Campbell Steven1ORCID,Papanikolopoulos Nikolaos2,Weight Christopher1

Affiliation:

1. Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute Cleveland OH USA

2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA

3. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany

4. Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok City Thailand

5. Case Western Reserve University Cleveland OH USA

6. Department of Diagnostic Radiology Imaging Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA

Abstract

ObjectiveTo automate the generation of three validated nephrometry scoring systems on preoperative computerised tomography (CT) scans by developing artificial intelligence (AI)‐based image processing methods. Subsequently, we aimed to evaluate the ability of these scores to predict meaningful pathological and perioperative outcomes.Patients and MethodsA total of 300 patients with preoperative CT with early arterial contrast phase were identified from a cohort of 544 consecutive patients undergoing surgical extirpation for suspected renal cancer. A deep neural network approach was used to automatically segment kidneys and tumours, and then geometric algorithms were used to measure the components of the concordance index (C‐Index), Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical classification of renal tumours (PADUA), and tumour contact surface area (CSA) nephrometry scores. Human scores were independently calculated by medical personnel blinded to the AI scores. AI and human score agreement was assessed using linear regression and predictive abilities for meaningful outcomes were assessed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.ResultsThe median (interquartile range) age was 60 (51–68) years, and 40% were female. The median tumour size was 4.2 cm and 91.3% had malignant tumours. In all, 27% of the tumours were high stage, 37% high grade, and 63% of the patients underwent partial nephrectomy. There was significant agreement between human and AI scores on linear regression analyses (R ranged from 0.574 to 0.828, all P < 0.001). The AI‐generated scores were equivalent or superior to human‐generated scores for all examined outcomes including high‐grade histology, high‐stage tumour, indolent tumour, pathological tumour necrosis, and radical nephrectomy (vs partial nephrectomy) surgical approach.ConclusionsFully automated AI‐generated C‐Index, PADUA, and tumour CSA nephrometry scores are similar to human‐generated scores and predict a wide variety of meaningful outcomes. Once validated, our results suggest that AI‐generated nephrometry scores could be delivered automatically from a preoperative CT scan to a clinician and patient at the point of care to aid in decision making.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3