Efforts to transfer ectopic embryos to the uterine cavity: A systematic review

Author:

Thomas Columba1ORCID,Donovan G. Kevin2,Fernandez Miguel A.3,Buskmiller Cara4

Affiliation:

1. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Georgetown University Washington District of Columbia USA

2. Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics Georgetown University Washington District of Columbia USA

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Georgetown University School of Medicine Washington District of Columbia USA

4. Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center McGovern Medical School Houston Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractAimThe objectives of this review are to identify and characterize attempts to transfer ectopic embryos to the uterus, and to understand arguments for and against the feasibility of such an intervention.MethodsAn electronic literature search involved all English language articles published in MEDLINE (1948–), Web of Science (1899–), and Scopus (1960–) before July 1, 2022. Articles were included that identify or describe attempts to transfer the embryo from its ectopic location to the uterine cavity, or discuss the feasibility of such an intervention; there were no exclusion criteria (PROSPERO registration number CRD42022364913).ResultsThe initial search yielded 3060 articles; 8 articles were included. Of these, two articles were case reports that described the successful transfer of the embryo from its ectopic location to the uterus, followed by term births; both cases involved laparotomy with salpingostomy, followed by transfer of the embryonic sac into the uterine cavity through an opening made in the uterine wall. The other six articles varied in type, and provided a number of arguments for and against the feasibility of such a procedure.ConclusionsThe evidence and arguments identified in this review may help manage expectations for those interested in transferring an ectopically implanted embryo in the hope of continuing the pregnancy, but who are uncertain about the extent to which such a procedure has been attempted or may be possible. Isolated case reports, with no evidence of replication, should be interpreted with the utmost caution and do not constitute a procedure for clinical use.

Funder

McDonald Agape Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3