In defense of open scientific discussion. Reply to Dr. <scp>McMahon</scp>-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

In defense of open scientific discussion. Reply to Dr. McMahon

Published:2023-03-29 Issue:4 Volume:29 Page:1887-1888
ISSN:1354-523X
Container-title:Oral Diseases
language:en
Short-container-title:Oral Diseases

Author:

Lodi Giovanni¹^ORCID,Sunavala‐Dossabhoy Gulshan²^ORCID,Petti Stefano³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Chirurgiche e Odontoiatriche Università degli Studi di Milano Milano Italy

2. LSU Health Sciences Center in Shreveport and Feist Weiller Cancer Center Shreveport, LA USA

3. Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases Sapienza University Rome Italy

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Dentistry,Otorhinolaryngology

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/odi.14560

Reference6 articles.

1. When systematic reviews are not done by experts

2. Content area experts as authors: helpful or harmful for systematic reviews and meta-analyses?

3. When medicine is evaluated without reference to patients and pathophysiological facts

4. Challenging NICO again?

5. A review targeting a result is a bias itself

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP