Parents' perceptions of patient safety in paediatric hospital care—A mixed‐methods systematic review

Author:

Witkowska Maria I.1ORCID,Janhunen Katja1,Sak‐Dankosky Natalia2ORCID,Kvist Tarja1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nursing Science University of Eastern Finland Kuopio Finland

2. Department of Clinical Nursing Medical University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland

Abstract

AbstractAim(s)To identify and summarize evidence on paediatric patient safety in a hospital setting from parents' point of view.DesignA mixed‐methods systematic review.Prospero IDID number CRD42023453626.Data SourcesPubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library and the Wiley database were searched in July 2023.Review MethodsTwo researchers independently applied eligibility criteria, selected studies and conducted a quality appraisal. Data‐based convergent synthesis and thematic content analysis were employed.ResultsTwelve studies were included: eight qualitative research studies, two cross‐sectional studies, one non‐randomized experimental study and one mixed‐methods study. The results were grouped into two themes—parental perceptions of inclusion in paediatric patient safety and parental perceptions of exclusion from paediatric patient safety—and comprised seven main subthemes: comfort in communication, parental engagement, communication difficulties, withdrawal from activity, uncertainty about available information and threats to patient safety.ConclusionsParents are willing to be engaged in care but require support from healthcare professionals, as they are often anxious about the condition of their children and actions they believe might be helpful. They need to be treated as valuable partners and be engaged in communication and decision processes.ImpactThe development and implementation of interventions involving parents in ensuring the safety of hospitalized paediatric patients should be of the utmost priority to healthcare organizations, as the common theme throughout the included studies was the need for improved communication with and recognition of parents as allies.Reporting MethodThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) checklist was followed.Patient or Public ContributionNo Patient or Public Contribution.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3