Geopolitical hostility and corporate innovation: Evidence from US high‐tech firms in trade sectors with China

Author:

Qiao Yankuo1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The George B. Delaplaine Jr. School of Business Hood College Frederick Maryland USA

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to empirically examine whether and how the innovation activities would change in the face of shocks caused by heightened US‐China tensions for US high‐tech firms from trade sectors with China. It is found that although the overall innovation intensity slides down during periods of heightened geopolitical risk and policy uncertainty, innovativeness of the US high‐tech companies from trade sectors with China is not completely suppressed by the escalated tensions and still maintains certain levels of momentum compared with other firms. However, the empirical evidence demonstrates that the superiority of the innovation intensity of US high‐tech companies from trade sectors with China to other firms is curbed during periods of heightened tensions in comparison with periods in the absence of geopolitical shocks and economic uncertainty. Moreover, the negative impact of US‐China tensions on corporate innovation is further amplified when the firm is less established, more financially constrained and of smaller size and less human power capital, each of which serves as an important moderator driving the negative relation. The findings of the paper are based on multifaceted empirical methods and contribute to the literature on corporate innovation, international trade, and geopolitical and economic tensions between nations.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Reference68 articles.

1. Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis;Acs Z. J.;The American Economic Review,1988

2. Competition and growth with step‐by‐step innovation: An example;Aghion P.;European Economic Review,1997

3. The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity;Aghion P.;The Review of Economics and Statistics,2009

4. CEO age and stock price crash risk;Andreou P. C.;Review of Finance,2017

5. Blade runner economics: Will innovation lead the economic recovery?;Archibugi D.;Research Policy,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3