Affiliation:
1. Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
2. Department of Biomedical Engineering Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
3. Department of Biomedical Engineering Yonsei University Wonju Republic of Korea
4. Quantitative Health Science Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
5. Imaging Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
6. Swiss Epilepsy Clinic Klinik Lengg Zurich Switzerland
7. Neuropathology University Hospital Erlangen Erlangen Germany
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveWe aim to improve focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) detection by combining high‐resolution, three‐dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) with voxel‐based morphometric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis.MethodsWe included 37 patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy and FCD (10 IIa, 15 IIb, 10 mild Malformation of Cortical Development [mMCD], and 2 mMCD with oligodendroglial hyperplasia and epilepsy [MOGHE]). Fifty‐nine healthy controls (HCs) were also included. 3D lesion labels were manually created. Whole‐brain MRF scans were obtained with 1 mm3 isotropic resolution, from which quantitative T1 and T2 maps were reconstructed. Voxel‐based MRI postprocessing, implemented with the morphometric analysis program (MAP18), was performed for FCD detection using clinical T1w images, outputting clusters with voxel‐wise lesion probabilities. Average MRF T1 and T2 were calculated in each cluster from MAP18 output for gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) separately. Normalized MRF T1 and T2 were calculated by z‐scores using HCs. Clusters that overlapped with the lesion labels were considered true positives (TPs); clusters with no overlap were considered false positives (FPs). Two‐sample t‐tests were performed to compare MRF measures between TP/FP clusters. A neural network model was trained using MRF values and cluster volume to distinguish TP/FP clusters. Ten‐fold cross‐validation was used to evaluate model performance at the cluster level. Leave‐one‐patient‐out cross‐validation was used to evaluate performance at the patient level.ResultsMRF metrics were significantly higher in TP than FP clusters, including GM T1, normalized WM T1, and normalized WM T2. The neural network model with normalized MRF measures and cluster volume as input achieved mean area under the curve (AUC) of .83, sensitivity of 82.1%, and specificity of 71.7%. This model showed superior performance over direct thresholding of MAP18 FCD probability map at both the cluster and patient levels, eliminating ≥75% FP clusters in 30% of patients and ≥50% of FP clusters in 91% of patients.SignificanceThis pilot study suggests the efficacy of MRF for reducing FPs in FCD detection, due to its quantitative values reflecting in vivo pathological changes. © 2024 International League Against Epilepsy.
Funder
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献