Smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates in oocytes associated with increased risk of neonatal birth defects: A meta‐analysis

Author:

Long Rui1ORCID,Wang Meng1,Yang Qiyu2,Zhang Yini1,Gao Limin1,Jin Lei1ORCID,Zhu Lixia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China

2. Department of Gynecology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPrevious studies have indicated the association between smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa+) and poorer medically assisted reproduction outcomes. However, the link between SERa+ and neonatal outcomes remains controversial and open for debate. A comprehensive meta‐analysis on the relation between SERa+ and the risk of birth defects is needed.Material and MethodsThe literature search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Libraries, Web of Science, and Chinese databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wan Fang from inception until July 2023. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by a fixed‐effected model, while heterogeneity was assessed by forest plots and I2 statistic. Funnel plot was produced to assess publication bias. This meta‐analysis has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022313387).ResultsThe search resulted in 122 studies, 14 of which met the inclusion criteria. The analysis of birth defects revealed a higher risk (RR = 2.17, 95%CI 1.24 to 3.81, p = 0.007) in children derived from SERa+ cycle compared to SERa‐ cycles (711 vs. 4633). Meanwhile, in a subgroup analysis, the risk of birth defects was significantly increased in the SERa+ oocytes group as compared with the sibling SERa‐ oocytes group (RR = 3.53, 95%CI 1.21 to 10.24, p = 0.02).ConclusionsTo conclude, our analysis indicated that SERa+ cycles/oocytes may have a potential risk of increased additional major birth defects comparing with SERa‐ cycles/oocytes. This conclusion may provide evidence‐based support for clinicians in IVF clinical guidance and embryologists in prudent embryo selection strategy.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3