Effect of breed, obturator type and surgical experience on tenoscopic portal creation into the digital flexor tendon sheath in horses

Author:

White Jonathan M.1,Hibner‐Szaltys Maria2,Duz Marco3,Withers Jonathan M.2,Marcatili Marco2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences The University of the West Indies St. Augustine Trinidad and Tobago

2. Pool House Veterinary Clinic Lichfield UK

3. School of Veterinary Medicine & Science University of Nottingham Sutton Bonnington UK

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo determine the influence of breed (cob [CB] and non‐cob [NC]), obturator type and surgical experience on the number of attempts, time taken and iatrogenic damage (ID) created when entering the digital flexor tendon sheath (DFTS) tenoscopically.Study designProspective experimental cadaveric study.AnimalsA total of 104 cadaver limbs.MethodsAn equal number of randomly selected CB and NC limbs were operated using a conical obturator (OB) or a switching stick (SS) by one boarded (BS) and one resident surgeon (RS). Skin measurements, number of attempts and time taken to enter the DFTS were recorded. The DFTS was endoscopically examined and then dissected to record ID and cumulative ID calculated.ResultsMean CB skin thickness (8.4 mm) was nearly twice that of NC limbs (4.5 mm) (p < .001). Mean DFTS entry took longer in CB limbs (133 s) compared to NC limbs (112 s) (p = .02). BS mean entry time in CB limbs was 115 s compared to 46 s in NC limbs (p < .001). Cumulative ID was greater in CB limbs (25 of 52 limbs with ID) compared to NC limbs (14 of 52 limbs with ID) (p = .04). No difference was noted between obturators. Surgical experience reduced attempts and time entering the DFTS.ConclusionSurgeons take longer to enter DFTS in CB limbs and more cumulative ID is created, regardless of obturator type used.Clinical significanceSkin thickness is a major determinant of time taken to enter the DFTS and increases the risk of ID. Awareness of the challenges in CB limbs is important.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3