Investigating prescribing errors in the emergency department of a large governmental hospital in Jordan

Author:

Abdel-Qader Derar H1,Al Meslamani Ahmad Z2ORCID,El-Shara' Asma' A3,Ismael Najlaa Saadi3,Albassam Abdullah4,Lewis Penny J5,Hamadi Salim1,Abbas Hazim Saleem1,Al Mazrouei Nadia6,Mohamed Ibrahim Osama67

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Pharmacy & Medical Sciences, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan

2. College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

3. Faculty of Pharmacy, Philadelphia University, Amman, Jordan

4. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait

5. Division of Pharmacy & Optometry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

6. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

7. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

Abstract

Abstract Background Although prescribing errors (PEs) are the most common type of medication errors and cause morbidity and mortality, they have been rarely studied. Objective The study aimed to investigate PEs incidence, types, severity, causes, predictors, pharmacists' interventions accepted by doctors and computer-related errors. Setting This study was conducted in the emergency department of the largest governmental hospital in Jordan. Method This was a retrospective observational 4-week study. A validated definition of PEs was adopted, and errors were identified by direct observation of all prescriptions. Structured interviews with doctors to assess the causes of errors were conducted within three days of the prescription date; the severity of PEs was rated by a committee. Main outcome measure Prescribing errors incidence, types, severity, causes, predictors, pharmacists' interventions accepted by doctors and computer-related errors. Results For 1330 patients, 3470 medication orders were recorded. Almost one in five patients had PEs (n = 288, 21.65%), and the total number of medication orders for patients who had errors was 610. The PEs incidence was 12.5% (95% CI 11.4%–3.5% (n = 450/3597)). Analgesics were the most common medications associated with PEs (232/610, 38.03%). The top two types of PEs detected were wrong drug (165/450, 36.6%) and wrong dose (142/450, 31.5%) respectively. Most PEs were clinically significant errors (342/450, 76%). Doctors refused pharmacists' interventions on their orders in 132 (45.8%) prescriptions. The most common cause of errors was poor skills of doctors in electronic prescribing system (266/450, 59%). Predictors of PEs were the following: drug with multiple dosage forms (OR 2.998; 95% CI 1.41–6.34; P = 0.004) and a prescription with polypharmacy (OR 1.685; 95% CI 1.25%–2.26%; P = 0.001). Conclusion A national approach for observing, intervening on and correcting PEs is necessary to improve patient safety.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous),Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Reference31 articles.

1. What is a prescribing error?;Dean;Qual Health Care,2000

2. Medication Without Harm [Internet];World Health Organization,2017

3. The epidemiology of prescribing errors;Bobb;Arch Intern Med,2004

4. Prevalence, nature, severity and risk factors for prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: prospective study in 20 UK hospitals;Ashcroft;Drug Saf,2015

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3