Efficacy and safety of adamgammadex for reversing rocuronium‐induced deep neuromuscular blockade: A multicenter, randomized, phase IIb study

Author:

Zhao Yanhua1,Chen Sifan1,Xie Wenqin2,Zhang Xiaoqing3,Chen Guozhong4,Ji Fuhai5,Wang Dongxin6,Qi Youmao7,Jie Qing7,Su Diansan1,Yu Weifeng1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Ren Ji Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China

2. Department of Anesthesiology Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University Quanzhou China

3. Department of Anesthesiology Tongji Hospital of Tongji University Shanghai China

4. Department of Anesthesiology The 900 Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force Fuzhou China

5. Department of Anesthesiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou China

6. Department of Anesthesiology Peking University First Hosptial Beijing China

7. Hangzhou Adamerck Pharmlabs Inc Hangzhou China

Abstract

AbstractThe rapid reversal of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is important but remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adamgammadex versus sugammadex in reversing deep rocuronium‐induced NMB. This multicenter, randomized, phase IIb study included 80 patients aged 18–64 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 1–2, undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with rocuronium. Patients were randomized to the adamgammadex 7, 8, and 9 mg/kg group or the sugammadex 4 mg/kg group. The primary efficacy variable was the time to recovery of train‐of‐four ratio (TOFr) to 0.9. The secondary efficacy variables were the time to recovery of TOFr to 0.7, antagonistic success rate of the recovery of TOFr to 0.9 within 5 min, and incidence rate of recurarization within 30 min after drug administration. The explorative efficacy variable was the time to recovery of the corrected TOFr to 0.9 (actual/baseline TOF ratio). Adamgammadex 7, 8, and 9 mg/kg and sugammadex 4 mg/kg groups did not significantly differ in all efficacy variables. Importantly, adamgammadex 9 mg/kg permitted reversal within a geometric mean of 2.9 min. According to the safety profile, adamgammadex achieved good tolerance and low incidence of drug‐related adverse events compared with the 4 mg/kg sugammadex. Adamgammadex 7, 8, and 9 mg/kg facilitated rapid reversal of deep rocuronium‐induced NMB and had good tolerance and low incidence of drug‐related adverse events. Therefore, adamgammadex is a potential and promising alternative to sugammadex.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3