Impact of diabetic versus non‐diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery on postoperative wound complications: A meta‐analysis

Author:

He Libin1,Liu Mingyuan2,He Yue3,Guo Ailin4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Operating Room, Xiang'an Hospital Xiamen University Xiamen China

2. Department of Endocrinology Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine Xiamen University Xiamen China

3. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology Run Run Shaw Hospital of the School of Medicine of Zhejiang University Hangzhou China

4. Department of Cardiac Surgery Xiangan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University Xiamen China

Abstract

AbstractThe effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the incidence of postoperative wound complications in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is still unclear. Thus, we performed a meta‐analysis of CABG in DM patients to evaluate existing data from both prospective and historical cohorts. The objective of this trial was to assess the relevance and extent of the effect of diabetes on the outcome of previous CABG procedures. Data sources like Embase and Pubmed were found throughout the research, and the language was limited to English through manual search. The searches were performed up to August 2023. The data were extracted from the study of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, the features of the population, the statistical approach and the clinical results. A qualitative evaluation of the qualifying studies has been carried out. Out of the 1874 studies identified, 21 cohort studies were chosen for analysis. Meta‐analyses were performed in 258 454 patients (71 351 diabetic and 187 103 non‐diabetic). Twenty‐one studies on deep sternal wound infections in CABG patients showed a lower rate of deep sternal wound infections in non‐diabetes group compared with those with diabetes (OR, 2.13; 95% CI: 1.97, 2.31, p < 0.00001). And 16 studies of superficial wound infections in patients undergoing CABG were found to be associated with a lower rate of superficial injury (OR, 1.93; 95% CI: 1.53, 2.43, p < 0.00001) compared with those with diabetes; In five trials, perfusion time during CABG (MD, 2.31; 95% CI: −0.16, 4.79, p = 0.07) was observed, and there were no significant differences between diabetes and non‐diabetes. Currently, there is a higher risk for CABG in diabetes than in non‐diabetes patients with sternal infections and superficial injuries. Future randomized trials will concentrate on the treatment of such perioperatively related complications, which will lower the risk of postoperative wound infection in diabetes.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Dermatology,Surgery

Reference48 articles.

1. Global Prevalence of Diabetes

2. Diabetic Macrovascular Disease

3. Perioperative glycaemic control for diabetic patients undergoing surgery;Buchleitner AM;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2012

4. Coronary Heart Disease in Patients With Diabetes

5. Perioperative management of diabetes mellitus: how should we act on the limited evidence?

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3