A novel virtual course to teach medical students high‐value decision‐making

Author:

Niranjan‐Azadi Ashwini1ORCID,Moulder Glenn2,Gusic Maryellen E.3,Hoke George2,Pahwa Amit4ORCID,Parsons Andrew S.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

2. Department of Medicine University of Virginia School of Medicine Charlottesville Virginia USA

3. Senior Associate Dean for Education and Professor of Biomedical Education and Data Science Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Pennsylvania USA

4. Department of Medicine and Pediatrics Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

5. Department of Medicine and Public Health Sciences University of Virginia School of Medicine Charlottesville Virginia USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAlthough a clinician's ability to employ high‐value decision‐making is influenced by training, many undergraduate medical education programmes lack a formal curriculum in high‐value, cost‐conscious care. We present a curriculum developed through a cross‐institutional collaboration that was used to teach students at two institutions about this topic and can serve as a framework for other institutions to develop similar curricula.ApproachThe faculty from the University of Virginia and the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine created a 2‐week‐long online course to teach medical students the fundamentals of high‐value care. The course consisted of learning modules, clinical cases, textbook studies, journal clubs and a competitive ‘Shark Tank’ final project where students proposed a realistic intervention to promote high‐value clinical care.EvaluationOver two‐thirds of students rated the course's quality as excellent or very good. Most found the online modules (92%), assigned textbook readings (89%) and ‘Shark Tank’ competition (83%) useful. To evaluate the student's ability to apply the concepts learned during the course in clinical contexts, we developed a scoring rubric based on the New World Kirkpatrick Model to evaluate students' proposals. Groups chosen as finalists (as determined by faculty judges) were more likely to be fourth‐year students (56%), achieved higher overall scores (p = 0.03), better incorporated cost impact at several levels (patient, hospital and national) (p = 0.001) and discussed both positive and negative impacts on patient safety (p = 0.04).ImplicationsThis course provides a framework for medical schools to use in their teaching of high‐value care. Cross‐institutional collaboration and online content overcame local barriers such as contextual factors and lack of faculty expertise, allowed for greater flexibility, and enabled focused curricular time to be spent on a capstone project competition. Prior clinical experience amongst medical students may be an enabling factor in promoting application of learning related to high‐value care.

Funder

University of Virginia

Johns Hopkins University

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Review and Exam Preparation,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3