No home‐field advantage in litter decomposition from the desert to temperate forest

Author:

van den Brink Liesbeth1ORCID,Canessa Rafaella12ORCID,Neidhardt Harald3ORCID,Knüver Timo34,Rios Rodrigo S.56ORCID,Saldaña Alfredo7ORCID,Cavieres Lohengrin A.78ORCID,Oelmann Yvonne3ORCID,Bader Maaike Y.2ORCID,Tielbörger Katja1

Affiliation:

1. Plant Ecology Group University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany

2. Ecological Plant Geography, Faculty of Geography University of Marburg Marburg Germany

3. Geoecology, Department of Geosciences University Tübingen Tübingen Germany

4. Ecophysiology, Department of Botany University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

5. Departamento de Biología Universidad de La Serena La Serena Chile

6. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Investigación en Ciencia y Tecnología Universidad de La Serena La Serena Chile

7. Departamento de Botánica, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas Universidad de Concepción Concepción Chile

8. Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity (IEB) Santiago Chile

Abstract

Abstract Litter decomposition rates are determined by the interplay of climate, decomposer organisms and litter quality. It has been suggested that the decomposer community may be locally adapted to litter quality, providing a home‐field advantage (HFA) resulting in accelerated decomposition of local compared to non‐local litter, after accounting for decomposition differences due to litter quality and the functional capacity of microorganisms. Although widely tested in forests, this hypothesis remains controversial and lacks support of its generality across climates. We therefore tested the HFA hypothesis for litter decomposition in four contrasting ecosystems along an extensive climatic gradient in Chile, using a translocation experiment involving litter from 20 species. In addition to comparing mass loss, we adopted a novel way to disentangle decomposer effects from climate effects, based on loss rates of elements that are actively released from the litter by decomposers during its breakdown versus elements that are simply leached by precipitation. We used the ratios of nitrogen and potassium losses (N/K loss) and phosphorus and potassium losses (P/K loss) to unravel the relative role of microbial breakdown (N and P loss) versus physical leaching (K loss) along the climate gradient. Thus, at each site, we tested whether litter mass loss, N/K loss and P/K loss presented an additional loss due to a HFA for local compared to non‐local litter. Across a wide range of environments and litter types, our findings unequivocally contradicted the HFA hypothesis. We observed no significantly positive HFA along the gradient; however, litter quality and the general ability of the decomposer community influenced litter decomposition much more strongly than origin or location of the litter. Our study questions the applicability of the HFA for litter decomposition and calls for more studies that include a large range of climatic conditions to understand the context‐dependency of HFA. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Funder

Consejo Nacional de Innovación, Ciencia y Tecnología

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3