Whole‐body MRI with diffusion‐weighted imaging as an adjunct to18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and CT in patients with suspected recurrent colorectal cancer

Author:

Willemse Jeroen R. J.12,Lahaye Max J.12,Kok Niels F. M.3,Grotenhuis Brechtje A.3,Aalbers Arend G. J.3,Beets Geerard L.23ORCID,Rijsemus Charlotte123,Maas Monique12,van Golen Larissa W.4,Beets‐Tan Regina G. H.12,Lambregts Doenja M. J.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands

2. GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands

3. Department of Surgical Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands

4. Department of Nuclear Medicine Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractAimThe aim was to explore how findings of whole‐body MRI including diffusion‐weighted imaging (DW‐MRI) compared to the routine diagnostic workup with CT and/or 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in patients with suspected recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC).MethodThis was an exploratory retrospective analysis of 55 patients with a clinical suspicion of recurrent CRC who underwent DW‐MRI following CT and/or FDG‐PET/CT. Two readers in consensus interpreted all clinical imaging reports and converted each described lesion into a confidence score (1 = definitely benign to 5 = definitely malignant). DW‐MRI findings were compared to the most recent previous CT or PET/CT. Any discrepant or additional DW‐MRI findings were documented and compared with histology and/or clinical follow‐up (if available).ResultsWhole‐body MRI including diffusion‐weighted imaging (DW‐MRI) resulted in discrepant/additional findings in 26/55 (47%) cases; 23/37 (62%) compared to previous CT and 3/18 (17%) compared to previous PET/CT. These included 10 cases where DW‐MRI converted previously inconclusive CT (n = 8) or PET/CT (n = 2) findings into a conclusive diagnosis, one where it contradicted a previous CT diagnosis of recurrence, five where DW‐MRI diagnosed recurrent disease not previously reported on CT and 10 cases where DW‐MRI detected additional lesions compared to CT (n = 9) or PET/CT (n = 1). Eighty‐eight per cent of cases with discrepant/additional findings concerned patients with recurrent/metachronous peritoneal metastases. In total, DW‐MRI resulted in 42 discrepant/additional lesions; the DW‐MRI diagnosis was correct in 76% of these lesions and incorrect (false positive) in 7%. In the remaining 17%, no standard of reference was available.ConclusionsThis explorative study suggests that DW‐MRI may be of added value to patients with a clinical suspicion for recurrent CRC, in particular to identify patients with peritoneal metastases. DW‐MRI mainly has potential as a ‘problem‐solver’ in patients with inconclusive or negative findings on previous imaging (in particular CT) and to detect additional disease sites in patients already diagnosed with recurrent disease.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Gastroenterology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3