Fact or fiction? Does the position of the end‐to‐end (EEA) stapler spike matter for colorectal anastomoses using a double‐stapled technique?

Abstract

AbstractAimSurgeons often have strong opinions about how to perform colorectal anastomoses with little data to support variations in technique. The aim of this study was to determine if location of the end‐to‐end (EEA) stapler spike relative to the rectal transection line is associated with anastomotic integrity.MethodThis study was a retrospective analysis of a quality collaborative database at a quaternary centre and regional hospitals. Patients with any left‐sided colon resection with double‐stapled anastomosis were included (December 2019 to August 2022). Our primary endpoint was a composite outcome including positive air insufflation test, incomplete anastomotic donut, or thin/eccentric donut. Our secondary endpoint was clinical leak.ResultsOverall, 633 patients were included and stratified by location of the stapler spike relative to the rectal transection line. Of note, 86 patients had an end‐colon to anterior rectum (“reverse Baker”) anastomosis with no crossing staple lines. The rates of the composite endpoint based on position of the stapler spike were 12.4% (anterior), 8.1% (through), 12.8% (posterior), 5.1% (corner), and 2.3% for the “reverse Baker” (p = 0.03). The overall rate of clinical leak was 3.8% and there were no differences between methods. In a multivariate analysis, the “reverse Baker” anastomosis was associated with decreased odds of poor anastomotic integrity when compared to anastomoses with crossing staple lines (OR 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05–0.87, p = 0.03).ConclusionsFor anastomoses with crossing staple lines, the position of the stapler spike relative to the rectal staple line is not associated with differences in anastomotic integrity. In contrast, anastomoses with no crossing staple lines resulted in significantly lower rates of poor anastomotic integrity, but no difference in clinical leaks.