Affiliation:
1. CEDESOG Universidad de La Laguna
2. Departamento de Economía and CEDESOG Universidad de La Laguna
3. CEMFI and Bank of Spain
Abstract
AbstractGlobal eradication of extreme poverty requires absolute convergence of poverty rates worldwide towards zero. Empirical analysis of poverty data for 100 emerging and developing countries over four decades reveals that such a goal is likely to remain elusive. Rather than absolute convergence, we find club convergence: countries' long‐run poverty rates cluster into several distinct clubs, whose number depends on the specific poverty dimension considered. Only the lowest‐poverty club exhibits poverty rates approaching zero by the end of the sample. In contrast, the highest‐poverty club, which accounts for nearly half the world's poor, evokes a poverty trap: its average poverty barely budged over the entire period examined. Overall, income—its initial level and, especially, its growth rate—matters more than inequality for shaping countries' club membership, particularly for the highest‐poverty club. Nevertheless, inequality plays a substantive role for membership in the intermediate‐poverty clubs, which achieved the greatest poverty reduction.
Reference59 articles.
1. Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind;Abramovitz M.;Journal of Economic History,1986
2. Regional convergence clubs in Europe: Identification and conditioning factors;Bartkowska M.;Economic Modelling,2012
3. Clustering and polarization in the distribution of output: A multivariate perspective;Battisti M.;Journal of Macroeconomics,2013
4. Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: what the long‐run data show;Baumol W. J.;American Economic Review,1986