Environmental remediation as social archaeology: Excavating sites contaminated by early nuclear weapons activities in New York City, both literally and hermeneutically
-
Published:2023-03-12
Issue:2
Volume:14
Page:318-330
-
ISSN:1758-5880
-
Container-title:Global Policy
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Global Policy
Author:
Bolton Matthew Breay1ORCID,
Ketterer Katherine2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Political Science, Dyson College of Arts and Sciences Pace University New York New York USA
2. Lycée Français de New York New York City New York USA
Abstract
AbstractNew York City, where the Manhattan Project began, has some of the world's oldest nuclear weapons production sites, exposing New Yorkers to ongoing risks of ionising radiation. This article considers six sites of particular environmental concern. Assessment, monitoring and clean‐up of these locations have taken place over three different periods: private remediation before 1992; federal government remediation in the early 1990s followed by two decades of neglect; and a long‐standing campaign to deal with risks at two remaining sites. Addressing radioactive legacies has involved a feedback loop between literal excavation of contaminated locations and a more hermeneutical process of meaning‐making. Journalists, activists and politicians have transformed some places into sites of memory, cultivating connections to concerns about environmental justice, radiation protection and nuclear disarmament. The 2017 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) established new obligations to remediate environments contaminated by nuclear weapons activities. While the USA refuses to join the TPNW, in‐depth, historical study of remediation at these sites can provide useful insight for states parties establishing policy to implement TPNW obligations. Recent passage of nuclear disarmament legislation by the NY City Council shows the ongoing policy relevance of nuclear weapons issues in local policymaking.
Subject
Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Economics and Econometrics,Global and Planetary Change
Reference87 articles.
1. @LenKusov. (2021)The site's not THAT radioactive….Twitter. Available from:https://twitter.com/LenKusov/status/1369322582328115208[Accessed 6 February 2023].
2. Army Corps of Engineers (ACE). (2022)Fact sheet: Staten island warehouse: Formerly utilized sites remedial action program (FUSRAP). Available from:https://www.nan.usace.army.mil/Media/Fact‐Sheets/Fact‐Sheet‐Article‐View/Article/2584232/fact‐sheet‐staten‐island‐warehouse/[Accessed 6 February 2023].
3. Berger J.D. Cotten P.R.&Payne J.L.(1992)Verification Survey of the Baker and Williams Warehouses Building 521–527. Available from:https://cpb‐us‐w2.wpmucdn.com/blogs.pace.edu/dist/0/195/files/2019/02/Verification‐Survey‐NY.61‐10‐1‐qh9sy8.pdf[Accessed 6 February 2023].
4. Toxic Sites as Places of Culture and Memory