Courts, climate litigation and the evolution of earth system law

Author:

Kotzé Louis J.123ORCID,Mayer Benoit4ORCID,van Asselt Harro56ORCID,Setzer Joana7,Biermann Frank8ORCID,Celis Nicolas9,Adelman Sam1011ORCID,Lewis Bridget12ORCID,Kennedy Amanda12ORCID,Arling Helen13ORCID,Peters Birgit13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Law North‐West University Potchefstroom South Africa

2. Law School University of Lincoln Lincoln UK

3. Research Institute for Sustainability Helmholtz Centre Potsdam Potsdam Germany

4. Faculty of Law Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China

5. Department of Land Economy University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

6. University of Eastern Finland Law School Joensuu Finland

7. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment London School of Economics and Political Science London UK

8. Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands

9. Fieldfisher: Climate Change, Energy and Utilities Practice Brussels Belgium

10. School of Law University of Warwick Coventry UK

11. Faculty of Law Nelson Mandela University Port Elizabeth South Africa

12. Faculty of Business and Law Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia

13. Faculty of Law University of Trier Trier Germany

Abstract

AbstractNumerous scientific reports have evidenced the transformation of the earth system due to human activities. These changes – captured under the term ‘Anthropocene’ – require a new perspective on global law and policy. The concept of ‘earth system law’ situates law in an earth system context and offers a new perspective to interrogate the role of law in governing planetary challenges such as climate change. The discourse on earth system law has not yet fully recognised courts as actors that could shape climate governance, while climate litigation discourse has insufficiently considered aspects of earth system law. We posit that courts play an increasingly influential climate governance role and that they need to be recognised as Anthropocene institutions within the earth system law paradigm. Drawing on a set of prominent climate cases, we discuss five inter‐related domains that are relevant for earth system law and where the potential influence of courts can be discerned: establishing accountability, redefining power relations, remedying vulnerabilities and injustices, increasing the reach and impact of international climate law and applying climate science to adjudicate legal disputes. We suggest that their innovative work in these domains could provide a basis for positioning courts as planetary climate governance actors.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Economics and Econometrics,Global and Planetary Change

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3