Prospective longitudinal comparative study showed that breastfeeding outcomes were comparable in preterm twins and singleton infants

Author:

Tandberg Bente Silnes12ORCID,Grundt Hege3,Moen Atle4ORCID,Niela‐Vilén Hannakaisa5,Flacking Renée6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Drammen Norway

2. Lovisenberg Diaconal University College Oslo Norway

3. Department of Neonatology Haukeland University Hospital Norway

4. Department of Neonatology Oslo University Hospital Norway

5. Department of Nursing Science University of Turku Finland

6. School of Health and Welfare Dalarna University Sweden

Abstract

AbstractAimWe compared milk volumes, skin‐to‐skin contact and breastfeeding by the mothers of very preterm twins and singleton infants born at 28–32 weeks of gestation.MethodsThis Norwegian longitudinal prospective comparative study was carried out in two neonatal intensive care units: one with single family rooms and one open bay unit. It comprised 49 singleton infants, 28 twins and their mothers. The mothers' milk volume and direct breastfeeding were recorded from birth until 4 months' of corrected age. They also answered the breastfeeding self‐efficacy scale and skin‐to‐skin contact was recorded.ResultsThe mothers of preterm twins produced doubled the volume of expressed milk at day 14, compared to the mothers of singletons (mean 816 ± 430 mL vs. 482 ± 372 mL, p < 0.05) and this difference was still sustained at 34 + 0 weeks/days (p < 0.02). Mothers of twins had their first breastfeeding attempt later than mothers of singletons (median of 133 h compared to 56 (p < 0.002). Preterm twins received less daily skin‐to‐skin contact (mean 157 ± 66 min each vs. 244 ± 109) (p < 0.001). There were no differences in receiving mother's own milk, exclusively direct breastfeeding or perceived breastfeeding self‐efficacy.ConclusionBreastfeeding was initiated as successfully in preterm twins as singletons as the mothers' milk production doubled.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3