PROBLEMS OF SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION IN GEOGRAPHY

Author:

GUELKE LEONARD

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Earth-Surface Processes,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference44 articles.

1. 1. In 1963 it was announced that a successful revolution had occurred in geography marrying quantitative methods and theory. The evocative use of the analogy of a completed revolution seems to have had the unfortunate result of stifling further critical evaluation of the nature of the changes that were taking place in geography by clearly implying that opposition to the "revolution" would be indefensible. See, Ian Burton "The Quantitative Revolution and Theoretical Geography," Can. Geog. vn/4 (1963 ), 151 -62 .

2. 2. On the assumption that any evaluation of the work of the new geographers must be based on their own professed scientific objectives the word "science" has been employed in a narrower sense than the writer would expect to find acceptable to geographers as a whole. The writer in no way wishes to imply that the only alternative to a narrowly conceived scientific geography is geography conceived of as an art. For a recent investigation into a non-positivist philosophical foundation for geography consult Edward Relph, "An Inquiry into the Relations between Phenomenology and Geography," Can. Geog. xiv/3 (1970). 193-201.

3. 3. This evaluation of the aims and methods of the new geography has, to a large extent, been based on the methodological writings of the following people: Peter Haggett, Richard Chorley, David Harvey, Brian Berry, William Bunge, Edward Ackerman, and Ian Burton All these geographers leave absolutely no doubt that they consider geography to be a science that is essentially similar to other sciences in its approach and methods. Their views on this question can be consulted in their many books and articles cited in this paper.

4. 4. Carl Hempel , "Aspects of Scientific Explanation," in Carl Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation (New York: The Free Press,1965 ), p.336 .

5. 5. There is, however, a pragmatic distinction between them. In an explanation the event is given and it is the determining conditions and relevant laws that are sought. In a prediction the occurrence of a future event is deduced from the determining conditions and relevant laws.

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3