Affiliation:
1. Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences Queen Mary University of London London UK
2. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Los Angeles CA USA
Abstract
The review by Sonuga‐Barke and colleagues offers a thoughtful and wide‐ranging appraisal of the current state of ADHD research, while also looking into the future to consider unresolved questions and critical next steps. Furthermore, it grapples with the tension between the need to define a coherent conceptualisation of ADHD for clinical and research purposes, while keeping an open mind to new research that challenges current consensus. In our commentary, we consider several cross‐cutting ideas discussed in Sonuga‐Barke et al., including the heterogeneous nature of ADHD, ensuring equity of translational research, and the importance of participatory research to support equitable and acceptable clinical practices for all individuals with ADHD.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献