Is the NHS low‐calorie diet programme delivered as planned? An observational study examining adherence of intervention delivery to service specification

Author:

Marwood Jordan1ORCID,Kinsella Karina1,Homer Catherine2,Drew Kevin J.1,Brown Tamara1,Evans Tamla S.1,Dhir Pooja1ORCID,Freeman Charlotte1,Jones Susan3,Bakhai Chirag4,Ells Louisa J.1

Affiliation:

1. Obesity Institute and School of Health, Leeds Beckett University Leeds UK

2. Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University Sheffield UK

3. School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University Middlesbrough UK

4. Larkside Practice, Churchfield Medical Centre Luton UK

Abstract

SummaryObesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) are chronic conditions with significant personal, societal, and economic impacts. Expanding on existing trial evidence, the NHS piloted a 52‐week low‐calorie diet programme for T2DM, delivered by private providers using total diet replacement products and behaviour change support. This study aimed to determine the extent to which providers and coaches adhered to the service specification outlined by NHS England. An observational qualitative study was conducted to examine the delivery of both one‐to‐one and group‐based delivery of programme sessions. Observations of 122 sessions across eight programme delivery samples and two service providers were completed. Adherence to the service specification was stronger for those outcomes that were easily measurable, such as weight and blood glucose, while less tangible elements of the specification, such as empowering service users, and person‐centred delivery were less consistently observed. One‐to‐one sessions were more successful in their person‐centred delivery, and the skills of the coaches delivering the sessions had a strong impact on adherence to the specification. Overall, the results show that there was variability by provider and delivery mode in the extent to which sessions of the NHS Low‐Calorie Diet Programme reflected the intended service specification. In subsequent programmes it is recommended that one‐to‐one sessions are used, with accompanying peer support, and that providers improve standardised training and quality assurance to ensure specification adherence.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3