Anaesthesia associates' clinical activity, case mix, supervision and involvement in peri‐operative cardiac arrest: analysis from the 7th National Audit Project

Author:

Cook Tim M.12ORCID,Kane Andrew D.34ORCID,Armstrong Richard A.35ORCID,Kursumovic Emira13ORCID,Varney Lee6,Moppett Iain K.7ORCID,Soar Jasmeet8ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust Bath UK

2. University of Bristol Bristol UK

3. Royal College of Anaesthetists London UK

4. Department of Anaesthesia James Cook University Hospital, South Tees NHS Foundation Trust Middlesbrough UK

5. Severn Deanery Bristol UK

6. Department of Anaesthesia University College London Hospitals London UK

7. University of Nottingham UK

8. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Southmead Hospital Bristol UK

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundWe analysed the clinical practice of anaesthesia associates in the UK, as reported to the 7th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists, and compared these with medically qualified anaesthetists.MethodsWe included data from our baseline survey, activity survey and case registry as with other reports from the project.ResultsAmong 197 departments of anaesthesia, 52 (26%) employed anaesthesia associates. Of 10,009 responding anaesthesia care providers, 71 (< 1%) were anaesthesia associates, of whom 33 (47%) reporting working nights or weekends (compared with 97% of medically qualified anaesthetists in training and > 90% of consultants). Anaesthesia associates reported less training and confidence in managing peri‐operative cardiac arrest and its aftermath compared with medically qualified anaesthetists. Anaesthesia associates were less directly involved in the management and the aftermath of peri‐operative cardiac arrest than medically qualified anaesthetists, and the psychological impacts on professional and personal life appeared to be less. Among 24,172 cases, anaesthesia associates attended 432 (2%) and were the senior anaesthesia care provider in 63 (< 1%), with indirect supervision in 27 (43%). Anaesthesia associates worked predominantly in a small number of surgical specialties during weekdays and working daytime hours. Complication rates were low in cases managed by anaesthesia associates, likely reflecting case mix. However, activity and registry case mix data show anaesthesia associates do manage high‐risk cases (patients who are older, comorbid, obese and frail) with the potential for serious complications. Registry cases included higher risk cases with respect to the clinical setting and patient factors.ConclusionAnaesthesia associates work in enhanced roles, relative to the scope of practice at qualification agreed by organisations. Recent changes mean the Royal College of Anaesthetists and Association of Anaesthetists do not currently support an enhanced scope of practice.

Funder

Royal College of Anaesthetists

Publisher

Wiley

Reference29 articles.

1. Royal College of Anaesthetists.AAGBI and RCoA Executive Summary: scope of practice for a PA(A) on qualification 2016.https://rcoa.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/2019‐08/Scope‐of‐Practice‐PAA‐2016.pdf(accessed 10/04/2024).

2. Scope of Practice for a PA(A) on qualification.https://anaesthesiaassociates.org/wp‐content/uploads/2018/03/Scope‐of‐Practice‐PAA‐2016.pdf(accessed 10/04/2024).

3. Allied Health Careers.https://careers.clevelandcliniclondon.uk/our‐careers/allied‐health/(accessed 12/03/2024).

4. NHS England.NHS long term workforce plan 2023.https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp‐content/uploads/2023/06/nhs‐long‐term‐workforce‐plan‐v1.2.pdf(accessed 12/03/2024).

5. NHS England.Anaesthesia Associate Role Impact Case Study. Jan 2024.https://www.hee.nhs.uk/our‐work/medical‐associate‐professions/impact‐case‐studies/anaesthesia‐associate‐role‐impact‐case‐study(accessed 21/05/2024).

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3