Survival outcomes after caudate lobectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCaudate lobectomy (CLB) remains the most effective treatment for caudate lobe hepatocellular carcinoma (CL‐HCC). However, there is controversy regarding the survival after CLB. This meta‐analysis aims to investigate the survival outcomes following CLB for the treatment of CL‐HCC.MethodsIn line with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, a search for all eligible studies was performed. The pooled estimates of survival rates and hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed‐ or random‐effects models.ResultsSixteen studies comprising 864 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimates of 3‐ and 5‐year overall survival (OS) rates were 62.3% and 42.9% respectively and the pooled estimate of 3‐ and 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (RFS) rates were 39.3% and 24.4% respectively. CL‐HCC showed inferior OS (HR:1.39, 95% CI: 0.91–1.88, P < 0.001) and RFS (HR:1.33, 95% CI: 1.10–1.56, P < 0.001) than other sites HCC. Isolated CLB showed better OS (HR:0.9, 95% CI:0.39–1.41, p < 0.001) and RFS (HR:0.76, 95% CI: 0.03–1.5, P = 0.04) than combined CLB.ConclusionsThe survival outcomes for CL‐HCC after CLB are lower compared to other sites HCC. Isolated CLB offers better survival outcomes compared to combined CLB. However, choosing isolated or combined approaches should be prioritized according to patient and tumour characteristics.