C‐reactive protein flare predicts response to checkpoint inhibitor treatment in melanoma

Author:

Kött Julian12ORCID,Zimmermann Noah12ORCID,Zell Tim12,Heidrich Isabel123,Geidel Glenn12ORCID,Rünger Alessandra12,Smit Daniel J.23,Merkle Myriam12,Parnian Niousha1,Hansen Inga12ORCID,Hoehne Inka12,Abeck Finn1,Torster Leopold1ORCID,Weichenthal Michael4,Pantel Klaus23,Schneider Stefan W.12ORCID,Gebhardt Christoffer12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology and Venereology University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf (UKE) Hamburg Germany

2. Fleur Hiege Center for Skin Cancer Research University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf (UKE) Hamburg Germany

3. Institute of Tumor Biology University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf (UKE) Hamburg Germany

4. Skin Cancer Center Kiel University Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein Kiel Germany

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe treatment of melanoma has been revolutionized by the use of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), but many patients do not benefit. Furthermore, immune‐related adverse events may occur during therapy. A predictive biomarker is needed to reliably identify patients benefitting. In lung, renal cell and bladder cancer early C‐reactive protein (CRP) kinetics were shown to be a predictive biomarker for ICI.ObjectiveHere, we investigate early CRP kinetics as predictive biomarker for ICI in melanoma patients.MethodsTwo independent prospectively collected cohorts were analysed: Cohort 1 (n = 87) with advanced and Cohort 2 (n = 99) with completely resected melanoma. Patients were stratified by in the dynamics of CRP after ICI initiation: A doubling of baseline CRP within 30 days followed by at least a 30% drop within 3 months was classified as a CRP flare. If no doubling of CRP was reported, but a 30% drop within 3 months, patients were classified as CRP responders and all others as CRP non‐responders. Analysed factors included clinical characteristics like S100B and LDH. Median follow‐up was 1.5 and 1.7 years for Cohorts 1 and 2.ResultsIn Cohort 1 CRP flare (n = 12), CRP responders (n = 43) and CRP non‐responders (n = 32) with a progression‐free survival (PFS) of 0.7, 0.6 and 0.2 years (p = 0.017) and an overall survival (OS) of 2.2, 1.5 and 1.0 years (p = 0.014), respectively. Multivariable Cox analysis showed an independent risk reduction of progression for CRP responders by 62% compared to CRP non‐responders (p = 0.001). In Cohort 2 CRP flare (n = 13), CRP responders (n = 70) and CRP non‐responders (n = 16) the log‐rank analysis showed a significant difference between OS and recurrence‐free survival (RFS) curves (p = 0.046 and p = 0.049).ConclusionEarly CRP kinetics could indicate a response to ICI with improved OS and RFS/PFS. CRP flare and CRP response indicating significantly improved outcomes compared to CRP non‐responders.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3