Perceived and actual value of Student‐led Objective Structured Clinical Examinations

Author:

Stretton Brandon1ORCID,Montagu Adam2,Kunnel Aline3,Louise Jenni3,Behrendt Nathan1,Kovoor Joshua14,Bacchi Stephen1,Thomas Josephine1ORCID,Davies Ellen2

Affiliation:

1. Adelaide Medical School The University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

2. Adelaide Health Simulation The University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

3. Biostatistics Unit South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute Adelaide South Australia Australia

4. Ballarat Base Hospital, Grampians Health Ballarat Ballarat, Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionStudent‐led Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) provide formative learning opportunities prior to Faculty‐led OSCEs. It is important to undertake quality assurance measurements of peer‐led assessments because, if they are found to be unreliable and invalid, they may have detrimental impacts. The objectives of this study were to explore and evaluate Student‐led OSCEs hosted by fifth‐year medical students.MethodsStudent‐led OSCE results were analysed to examine reliability (Cronbach's alpha). The relationship between Student‐led and Faculty‐led OSCEs was evaluated using linear regression. Qualitative data were acquired by survey and semi‐structured interviews and were analysed using an inductive content analysis approach.ResultsIn total, 85 (94%) of 91 eligible students consented to study participation. Student‐led OSCEs had a low‐moderate reliability [Cronbach alpha = 0.47 (primary care) and 0.61 (human reproduction/paediatrics) (HRH)]. A statistically significant, positive relationship between Student‐led and Faculty‐led OSCE results was observed. Faculty‐led OSCE grades increased by 0.49 (95% CI: 0.18, 0.80) to 1.09 (95% CI: 0.67, 1.52), for each percentage increase in Student‐led OSCE result. Student‐led OSCE participants highly valued the authentic peer‐assessed experience. Reported benefits included a reduction of perceived stress and anxiety prior to Faculty‐led OSCEs, recognition of learning gaps, contribution to overall clinical competency and facilitation of collaboration between peers.DiscussionStudent‐led OSCEs are moderately reliable and can predict Faculty‐led OSCE performance. This form of near‐peer assessment encourages the metacognitive process of reflective practice and can be effectively implemented to direct further study. Faculties should collaborate with their student bodies to facilitate Student‐led OSCEs and offer assistance to improve the quality, and benefits, of these endeavours.

Funder

Avant Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3