Biases and information gaps in the study of habitat connectivity in the Carnivora in the Americas

Author:

Balbuena‐Serrano Ángel1,Zarco‐González Martha Mariela2ORCID,Monroy‐Vilchis Octavio34

Affiliation:

1. División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación Instituto Tecnológico de Toluca, Tecnológico Nacional de México Av. Tecnológico S/N. Colonia Agrícola Bellavista, C.P. 52149 Metepec Estado de México Mexico

2. Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Rurales‐Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México Campus El Cerrillo Piedras Blancas Toluca Estado de México 50090 Mexico

3. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Lerma Av. de las garzas, El Panteón Lerma Estado de México 52005 México

4. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México Instituto literario No. 100 Toluca Estado de Mexico 50000 México

Abstract

Abstract Habitat connectivity is essential to mitigate the effects of fragmentation by maintaining ecological processes, exchange of individuals, and gene flow among isolated populations. In the last two decades, the importance of habitat connectivity has been highlighted and the number of studies that address this issue has increased. We review and describe the habitat‐connectivity studies for the Carnivora in the Americas to identify taxonomic, geographic, and methodological biases, and we examine the number of publications on habitat connectivity and their relationship with country‐level parameters. We reviewed habitat‐connectivity studies published between 2000 and 2020. We quantified studies by region, country, family, and species. We identified information gaps and analysed each country based on the proportion of land modified by humans, species richness, percentage of carnivoran species that are at risk of extinction, and the percentage of territory that is within Protected Areas. G‐tests were performed to verify if the number of published connectivity studies differed based on these variables. There is an increasing trend in the number of studies; however, this increasing is not proportional among countries, among families, or among carnivoran species. We identified that there is a regional bias, since more than 75% of the studies were carried out in North America, in addition, taxonomic bias indicates that the studies focused on large carnivorans. Regarding the methodological bias, the least‐cost path was the most used approach. There are fewer studies on habitat connectivity in countries with higher fragmentation rates, higher percentages of species that are at risk of extinction and less percentage of land in Protected Areas. The capability of countries to invest in research, the study focused on large charismatic species and the difficulty to obtaining dispersion data are factors that have influenced in the study of habitat connectivity.

Funder

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología

Consejo Mexiquense de Ciencia y Tecnología

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3