Detection of pathological contrast enhancement with synthetic brain imaging from quantitative multiparametric MRI

Author:

Donatelli Graziella12ORCID,Migaleddu Gianmichele1ORCID,Cencini Matteo3ORCID,Cecchi Paolo12ORCID,D'Amelio Claudio4,Peretti Luca25ORCID,Buonincontri Guido5ORCID,Tosetti Michela5ORCID,Costagli Mauro56ORCID,Cosottini Mirco4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Neuroradiology Unit Azienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria Pisana Pisa Italy

2. Imago7 Research Foundation Pisa Italy

3. Pisa Division National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN) Pisa Italy

4. Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery University of Pisa Pisa Italy

5. Laboratory of Medical Physics and Magnetic Resonance IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris Pisa Italy

6. Department of Neuroscience Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Sciences (DINOGMI), University of Genoa Genoa Italy

Abstract

AbstractBackground and PurposeWe aimed to test whether synthetic T1‐weighted imaging derived from a post‐contrast Quantitative Transient‐state Imaging (QTI) acquisition enabled revealing pathological contrast enhancement in intracranial lesions.MethodsThe analysis included 141 patients who underwent a 3 Tesla‐MRI brain exam with intravenous contrast media administration, with the post‐contrast acquisition protocol comprising a three‐dimensional fast spoiled gradient echo (FSPGR) sequence and a QTI acquisition. Synthetic T1‐weighted images were generated from QTI‐derived quantitative maps of relaxation times and proton density. Two neuroradiologists assessed synthetic and conventional post‐contrast T1‐weighted images for the presence and pattern of pathological contrast enhancement in intracranial lesions. Enhancement volumes were quantitatively compared.ResultsUsing conventional imaging as a reference, synthetic T1‐weighted imaging was 93% sensitive in revealing the presence of contrast enhancing lesions. The agreement for the presence/absence of contrast enhancement was almost perfect both between readers (k = 1 for both conventional and synthetic imaging) and between sequences (k = 0.98 for both readers). In 91% of lesions, synthetic T1‐weighted imaging showed the same pattern of contrast enhancement visible in conventional imaging. Differences in enhancement pattern in the remaining lesions can be due to the lower spatial resolution and the longer acquisition delay from contrast media administration of QTI compared to FSPGR. Overall, enhancement volumes appeared larger in synthetic imaging.ConclusionsQTI‐derived post‐contrast synthetic T1‐weighted imaging captures pathological contrast enhancement in most intracranial enhancing lesions. Further comparative studies employing quantitative imaging with higher spatial resolution is needed to support our data and explore possible future applications in clinical trials.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3