Affiliation:
1. Department of Oral Implantology Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Disease & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology Beijing China
2. Center of Digital Dentistry Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology Beijing China
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesTo compare the survival and complication rates of posterior screw‐retained monolithic lithium disilicate (LS2)/veneered zirconia (ZrO2) single implant crowns (SICs), as well as analyze the occlusal changes observed during a 3‐year follow‐up period.Materials and MethodsThirty‐three patients were included and randomly divided into two groups. The test group consisted of 17 patients who received monolithic‐LS2–SIC, while the control group consisted of 16 patients who received veneered‐ZrO2‐SIC. Implant/prosthesis survival rates, technical complications, peri‐implant soft tissue conditions, and quantitative occlusal changes of SIC (obtained by the intra‐oral scanner and analyzed in reverse software Geomagic Control 2015) were assessed at 1‐ and 3‐year follow‐ups. Bone loss and Functional Implant Prosthodontic Score (FIPS) were evaluated at a 3‐year follow‐up.ResultsAfter a 3‐year follow‐up period, one patient dropped out of the follow‐up. No implant loss was observed. One crown was fractured, resulting in prosthesis survival rates of 93.75% for the monolithic group and 100% for the veneered group. A technical complication rate of 25% (4/16) was observed in the veneered group (p = .333). No significant differences in the marginal bone loss were observed at the 3‐year follow‐up (0.00 (−0.22, 0.17) mm versus 0.00 (−0.12, 0.12) mm, p = .956). The total FIPS scores for the test group were 9.0 (9.0, 9.0), while the control group received scores of 9.0 (8.0, 10.0) (p = .953). The changes in mean occlusal clearance were 0.022 ± 0.083 mm for the test and 0.034 ± 0.077 mm for the control group (at 3 years, p = .497). The changes in occlusal contact area were 1.075 ± 2.575 mm2 for the test and 1.676 ± 2.551 mm2 for the control group (at 3 years, p = .873).ConclusionAfter a 3‐year follow‐up, screw‐retained monolithic LS2 and veneered ZrO2 SIC demonstrated similar survival rates. The occlusal performance of implant prostheses needs to be closely examined during follow‐up, and appropriate occlusal adjustments need to be considered.
Reference36 articles.
1. Impact of prosthetic material on mid‐ and long‐term outcome of dental implants supporting single crowns and fixed partial dentures: A systematic review and meta‐analysis;Abou‐Ayash S.;European Journal of Oral Implantology,2017
2. Single-Tooth Replacement Using Dental Implants Supporting All-Ceramic and Metal-Based Reconstructions: Results at 18 Months of Loading
3. Analyzing the morphology and intensity of occlusal contacts in implant‐prosthetic restorations using T‐scan system;CotruTa A. M.;Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology,2015
4. Human tooth wear in the past and the present: Tribological mechanisms, scoring systems, dental and skeletal compensations
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献