Influencing factors in surgical decision‐making: a qualitative analysis of colorectal surgeons' experiences of postoperative complications

Author:

Bisset Carly N.12ORCID,Moug Susan J.134ORCID,Oliphant Raymond25,Dames Nicola6,Parson Simon2,Cleland Jennifer7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Surgery Royal Alexandra Hospital Paisley UK

2. University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK

3. Department of General Surgery Golden Jubilee University National Hospital Clydebank UK

4. University of Glasgow Glasgow UK

5. Department of Colorectal Surgery Raigmore Hospital Inverness UK

6. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland Patient Liaison Group Oxford UK

7. Medical Education Research and Scholarship Unit, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore

Abstract

AbstractAimWhen making anastomotic decisions in rectal cancer surgery, surgeons must consider the risk of anastomotic leakage, which bears implications for the patient's quality of life, cancer recurrence and, potentially, death. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of colorectal surgeons on how their individual attributes (e.g. experience, personality traits) may influence their decision‐making and experience of complications.MethodThis qualitative study used individual interviews for data collection. Purposive sampling was used to invite certified UK‐based colorectal surgeons to participate. Participants were recruited until ongoing data review indicated no new codes were generated, suggesting data sufficiency. Data were analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke's six‐step framework.ResultsSeventeen colorectal surgeons (eight female, nine male) participated. Two key themes with relevant subthemes were identified: (1) personal attributes influencing variation in decision‐making (e.g. demographics, personality) and (2) the influence of complications on decision‐making. Surgeons described variation in the management of complications based upon their personal attributes, which included factors such as gender, experience and subspeciality interests. Surgeons described the detrimental impact of anastomotic leakage on their mental and physical health. Experience of anastomotic leakage influences future decision‐making and is associated with changes in practice even when a technical error is not identified.ConclusionColorectal surgeons consider anastomotic leaks to be personal ‘failures’, which has a negative impact on surgeon welfare. Better understanding of how surgeons make difficult decisions, and how surgeons respond to and learn from complications, is necessary to identify ‘personalized’ methods of supporting surgeons at all career stages, which may improve patient outcomes.

Funder

Bowel Research UK

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3