Safety and feasibility of colonoscopy in nonagenarians: A systematic review, meta‐analysis and meta‐regression analysis

Abstract

AbstractAimThe aim of this work was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of performing colonoscopy in patients aged 90 years or over.MethodIn compliance with PRISMA statement standards, a systematic review of studies reporting the outcomes of colonoscopy in patients aged ≥90 years was conducted. A proportional meta‐analysis model was constructed to quantify the risk of outcomes and a direct comparison meta‐analysis model was constructed to compare outcomes between nonagenarians and patients aged between 50 and 89 years via random‐effects models.ResultsSeven studies enrolling 1304 patients (1342 colonoscopies) were included. Analyses showed that complications related to bowel preparation occurred in 0.7% (95% CI 0.1%–1.6%), procedural complications in 0.6% (0.00%–1.7%), 30‐day complications in 1.5% (0.6%–2.7%), procedural mortality in 0.3% (0.0%–1.1%) and 30‐day mortality in 1.1% (0.3%–2.2%). Adequate bowel preparation and colonoscopy completion were achieved in 81.3% (73.8%–87.9%) and 92.1% (86.7%–96.3%), respectively. No difference was found in bowel preparation‐related complications [risk difference (RD) 0.00, p = 0.78], procedural complications (RD 0.00, p = 0.60), 30‐day complications (RD 0.01, p = 0.20), procedural mortality (RD 0.00, p = 1.00) or 30‐day mortality (RD 0.01, p = 0.34) between nonagenarians and patients aged between 50 and 89 years. The colorectal cancer detection rate was 14.3% (9.8%–19.5%), resulting in therapeutic intervention in 65.9% (54.5%–76.6%).ConclusionsAlthough the evidence is limited to a selected group of nonagenarians, it may be fair to conclude that if a colonoscopy is indicated in a nonagenarian with good performance status (based on initial less‐invasive investigations), the level 2 evidence supports its safety and feasibility. Age on its own should not be a reason for failing to offer colonoscopy to a nonagenarian.