Low energy contact X‐ray brachytherapy for treatment of rectal cancer: a health technology appraisal by Health Technology Wales

Author:

Bennett Hayley1ORCID,Rao Christopher23,Batten Leona1,Hasler Elise1ORCID,Jarrom David1ORCID,Prettyjohns Matthew1,Barrington Craig4,Sun Myint Arthur56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Health Technology Wales Cardiff UK

2. Department of Colorectal Surgery North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust Carlisle UK

3. Department of Surgery and Cancer Imperial College London London UK

4. South West Wales Cancer Centre Swansea Bay University Health Board Swansea UK

5. Papillon Unit Clatterbridge Cancer Centre Liverpool UK

6. Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

Abstract

AbstractAimHealth Technology Wales sought to evaluate the clinical and cost‐effectiveness of contact X‐ray brachytherapy (CXB) for early‐stage rectal cancer.MethodsRelevant studies were identified through systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus. A cost‐utility model was developed to estimate the cost‐effectiveness of CXB in National Health Service Wales, using results of the Organ Preservation in Early Rectal Adenocarcinoma (OPERA) trial. Patient perspectives were obtained through the Papillon Patient Support group and All‐Wales Cancer Network.ResultsThe OPERA randomized controlled trial showed that CXB improved complete response and organ preservation rates compared with external‐beam boost for people with T2–3b, N0–1, M0 rectal cancer who are fit for surgery. Managing more of this population non‐operatively after CXB was estimated to provide 0.2 quality‐adjusted life years at an additional cost of £887 per person. CXB was cost effective compared with external‐beam boost at a cost of £4463 per quality‐adjusted life year gained. This conclusion did not change in scenario analysis and CXB was cost effective in 91% of probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Patients valued receiving clear information on all available options to support their individual treatment choices. The detrimental impact of a stoma on quality of life led some patients to reject the idea that surgery was their only option.ConclusionThis evidence review and cost‐utility analysis indicates that CXB is likely to be clinically and cost effective, as part of a watch and wait strategy for adults fit for surgery. Wider access to CXB is supported by patient testimonies.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3