Affiliation:
1. Department of Health and Physical Education The Education University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China
2. Department of Sports Science and Physical Education The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundFeeding problems in children with autism jeopardize the well‐being of both children with autism and their families. Mixed findings were reported from previous interventions, which were mostly evaluated by single subject research design (SSRD) studies. Moreover, feasibility assessment and social validity measurement were unaddressed by these SSRD studies. To fill this substantial knowledge gap, the present review systematically summarized and evaluated feeding interventions implemented in children with autism, which were assessed by studies employing group designs.MethodAn extensive literature search in eight established online databases was conducted, and a total of 17 eligible studies published in 2009–2021 were included for further analysis. A descriptive account of the features of the investigations is provided, including assessment of study quality.ResultsA total of 449 children with autism and 203 parents/caregivers participated in the included studies. The multiple use of five strategic intervention components were highlighted in this review, including nutrition education/consultations, environmental modifications, sensory exposure, cognitive components, and behaviour interventions. The reviewed interventions showed a preliminarily positive effect for modifying feeding problems in children with autism. Furthermore, the evaluation based on the RE‐AIM framework (reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) demonstrated that an interdisciplinary multi‐component intervention strategy may achieve high effectiveness and feasibility in improving feeding problems in a wide range of children with autism.ConclusionsThis review found that interventions achieved and maintained a positive effect on modification of feeding problems in groups of children with autism. Information and gaps identified and summarized in the implementation process may assist both researchers and stakeholders to further support these vulnerable children.